The Greater Bay Area and Hainan FTP: Comparing China’s Preferential Policies
In 2018, China released its blueprint for the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), which aimed to integrate and transform nine mainland cities in the Pearl River Delta and two special administrative regions – Hong Kong and Macao – into an international bay area that will rival other such world-class city clusters like the New York, San Francisco, and Tokyo bay areas.
That same year, not far from the southwest of the GBA, Chinese policymakers decided to categorize the entire province of Hainan island as a free trade zone (FTZ). Recently, on June 1, 2020, Beijing rolled out a master plan, laying out a series of special policies, in a bolder move to develop Hainan into a high-level free trade port (FTP). The objective here would be to make Hainan FTP at par with other international trade ports like Hong Kong, Singapore, Rotterdam, and Dubai by 2050.
The two regions – GBA and Hainan FTP – lead China’s renewed efforts to improve its incentives, capacity, and infrastructure for investors, traders, and manufacturers – but are on different paths in terms of how they seek to achieve these development goals.
The GBA focuses on urban integration, industrial cooperation, and technology innovation within its area. So, it will concentrate on enabling the free flow of talents, technologies, and capital, which will open opportunities in the high-tech, financial, construction, and manufacturing industries.
On the other hand, the Hainan FTP aims to build a port area with more liberalized special customs supervision, which will allow free cross-border flows of trade, investment, capital, personnel, transport, and data. To improve its smaller-scale economy and develop local industries, Hainan will also release its own Negative List and provide broader market access for foreign investment in specific industries like healthcare, telecommunication, tourism, and education.
Nevertheless, the GBA and Hainan have both introduced similar preferential policies, such as lowering tax rates, facilitating capital flows and currency exchanges, and offering subsidies, to attract investors and talents. This article enumerates and compares the favorable policies in the two regions to enable investors to make a more informed decision.
Policies on cross-border capital flows, investment, and financing
The Greater Bay Area
On May 14, 2020, China unveiled the Opinions Concerning Financial Support for the Establishment of the GBA (Yin Fa [2020] No.95), which included 26 measures to support the financial reforms and opening- up for the GBA. The measures introduced various support mechanisms concentrating on cross-border investment and financing facilitation, financial market and financial infrastructure connectivity, and the internationalization of RMB (promoting the use of RMB currency in the GBA).
The financial reform policies in the GBA aim to deepen the financial cooperation between Hong Kong, Macao, and nine mainland cities where different currencies are adopted (the Hong Kong Dollar, Macanese Pataca, and China’s RMB) and governed under three distinct administrative systems, which becomes a sticking point for freer cash flow within the GBA. Thus, the GBA’s financial reform policies open big opportunities in banking, securities, and insurance industries and future market.
The Opinions proposed to establish the Guangzhou Futures Exchange and the Greater Bay Area International Commercial Bank, as well as optimize the improvement of financial market connectivity arrangements, such as the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Bond Connect. Cross-border bank accounts are also permitted in the GBA after the launch of the “Wealth Management Connect”.
The Hainan Free Trade Port
In the overall plan for Hainan FTP’s construction, the province’s financial reform policy is a key component. But where Hainan’s financial reform policies are unique as compared to the GBA relates to their main focus – serving the investment and financing needs of the local real economy.
Thus, with the focus on trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, Hainan will support the development of international trading venues for energy, shipping, property rights, and equity. Hainan will also support the development of real estate investment trusts (REITs), the issuance of corporate credit bonds, project revenue notes (PRN), and special bonds for housing leasing, pilot the securitization of tourism assets, develop settlement centers, and assist overseas financial institutions to enter Hainan.
Policies in individual income tax
The Greater Bay Area
To attract global talents to contribute to the development of the GBA and Hainan, the nine mainland GBA cities and Hainan province all introduced similar preferential individual income tax (IIT) policies – the Circular about the Implementation of Individual Income Tax Preferential Policies in the GBA (Yue Cai Shui [2019] No.2) and the Circular about Individual Income Tax Policy for High-End and Urgently Needed Talents at Hainan FTP (Cai Shui [2020] No.32)
Currently, the IIT system of the mainland China adopts a seven-level progressive rate, ranging from three percent to 45 percent, which is much higher than Hong Kong’s salary tax and personal assessment, which is at a five-level progressive rate, ranging from two percent to 17 percent or a standard rate of 15 percent.
To lower the IIT rate and offset the difference with Hong Kong, nine mainland GBA cities have introduced IIT subsidies from 2019 to 2023. During this period, the portion of the IIT that exceeds 15 percent of the taxable income paid of the qualified overseas talent will be refunded as fiscal subsidies.
The Hainan Free Trade Port
Hainan FTP also lowered its IIT rate to 15 percent from 2020 to 2025, but the policy is open to both overseas and domestic talents. Moreover, from 2025 to 2035, Hainan FTP will continue to reduce IIT rates to three, 10, and 15 percent (three tax brackets) for eligible talents’ taxable income earned in Hainan, although qualified foreign or Chinese talents have to stay in Hainan for no less than 183 days a year.
Policies in corporate income tax
The Hainan Free Trade Port
In terms of preferential corporate income tax (CIT), Hainan FTP rolled out the Circular about Preferential Corporate Income Tax Policy for Hainan FTP (Cai Shui [2020] No.31) on June 30, 2020.
The policy allows enterprises registered in Hainan and encouraged industries in Hainan to enjoy a lower CIT rate of 15 percent from 2020 to 2025; income from new overseas direct investment derived by enterprises in the tourism, modern service, and high-tech industry can be exempted from CIT; eligible capital expenditures can be allowed one-off pre-tax deductions or accelerated depreciation and amortization.
Besides, by 2035, all enterprises will enjoy the favorable 15 percent CIT rate – so long as they are in the industries outside of Hainan’s to-be-announced Negative List.
The Greater Bay Area
However, GBA cities have not introduced any favorable CIT policy where enterprises settled in the mainland cities may still be subject to a 25 percent CIT rate. Currently, only some free trade areas in mainland China like Shanghai Lingang New Area, Shenzhen Qianhai Free Trade Area, and Zhuhai Hengqin Free Trade Area offer CIT of 15 percent for enterprises in key industries.
Other incentives
Trade
In addition to the above tax breaks, as a free trade port, Hainan also imposes zero-tariff policy on offshore duty-free goods. Some of the other imported goods will also be exempt from import duties, import value-added tax (VAT), and import consumption tax (CT) before the whole island becomes a separate customs jurisdiction.
After the whole island is ring-fenced and the tax regime is streamlined, all goods – that are outside the to-be-formulated Negative List of commodities subject to import taxes – will possibly be exempt from import duties.
In addition, for enterprises engaged in encouraged sectors in Hainan FTP, their imported products can be exempted from import tariffs when entering the rest of China, provided that the imported intermediary products get added value exceeding 30 percent after processing in Hainan FTP.
Setting up headquarters
Both the GBA and Hainan FTP have offered tempting incentives for the headquarters of multinational corporations (MNCs) and international organizations and senior management personnel working for these headquarters.
Our expert take
The GBA and Hainan FTP will facilitate each other’s development going forward so looking at them purely from the perspective of a competitive relationship will offer limited insights. The GBA, as a high-end manufacturing and modern service center, will provide international and domestic industrial chain and supply chain support for Hainan. In turn, the Hainan FTP, as a significant node of the ‘Maritime Silk Road’ under China’s Belt and Road initiative, may bring more investment and trade opportunities to the GBA, especially related to ASEAN countries.
Both regions offer great incentives that will encourage many foreign enterprises to consider setting up there. The Hainan FTP, as China’s largest and only free trade port, has rolled out more innovative favorable policies, especially with regard to taxes, compared with the GBA. However, this is because its relatively small scale, less-developed existing economic structure, and lower level of infrastructure, presents more obstacles to attract talents and investors.
Ultimately, both the GBA and Hainan will open opportunities across multiple industries and the services sector – high-tech, financial, construction, logistics, etc., but there are differences in key development segments. The GBA will seek to build industrial clusters where high-tech manufacturing, fintech, and smart city sectors will flourish, while Hainan will reduce restrictions on market access and open up the three leading industries – tourism, modern service industries, and new and high-tech industries.
We recommend that investors define the development direction and strategic positioning of their business, taking into full account the investment holding structure, business model, capital liquidity, investment and financing facilities, differences in the tax systems of these areas, and the practical difficulties of setting up.
Dezan Shira & Associates has been paying close attention to the development of the GBA and Hainan FTZ and FTP. We can offer in-depth insight and have rich experience in relevant professional fields, such as business intelligence, supply chain management, company incorporation, tax planning, human resource planning and payroll management, and trade and customs affairs. We can provide appropriate advice and services in site selection and incorporation, tax optimization, and assessing the eligibility and applying for preferential policy treatment. Please contact us for assistance at China@dezshira.com.
About Us
China Briefing is written and produced by Dezan Shira & Associates. The practice assists foreign investors into China and has done so since 1992 through offices in Beijing, Tianjin, Dalian, Qingdao, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong. Please contact the firm for assistance in China at china@dezshira.com.
We also maintain offices assisting foreign investors in Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, The Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, United States, and Italy, in addition to our practices in India and Russia and our trade research facilities along the Belt & Road Initiative.
- Previous Article How the Tax System is Organized in China
- Next Article China’s Incentives for Integrated Circuit, Software Enterprises